A major disadvantage of top-down forecasting is that sales, inventory, and most relevant data points are averaged. This can make tracking the root of variances from projections difficult to assess. This method is typically reserved for earlier-stage companies lacking the resources to manage a bottom-up approach. The first model starts with a general overview look before drilling down to specific terms, while the latter model does the exact opposite. Both forecasting models can be effective when used properly, but some companies prefer to use one over the other for various reasons. Sales success starts with sales planning, but without a command of your data you’re basing those plans on intuition, estimates and guesses, leaving you vulnerable to missed numbers and poor performance.
For the Price of Services
Each team rolls up its sleeves and crafts its own sales, revenue, or production forecasts. All of which, are informed by their knowledge of the market, customer demands, and in-house capabilities. Once these customized forecasts are wrapped up, they’re woven together to form a comprehensive financial tapestry for the entire organization.
- Accurate forecasts provide clear direction for sales professionals, helping them allocate their time, energy, and resources to the correct prospects and deals.
- Each scenario is built on a set of assumptions, which are then used to model the financial impact on the organization.
- Compared to the top-down forecasting approach, the bottoms-up forecast is much more time-consuming, and sometimes, can become even too granular.
- Bottom-up forecasting looks into each and every aspect of the everyday operations of the company.
- Meet Sybill, the AI assistant that clears your to-do list, from follow-ups to collateral creation — all in YOUR tone, so you can focus on customers & deals.
When employees are involved and engaged with the forecasting process, they’re more motivated to work toward achieving forecasted outcomes. Bottom-up analysis in market sizing builds from specific, granular data points to create an aggregate market estimate. For example, calculating the total market for a B2B software product by multiplying the number of potential customer companies by average deal size and estimated penetration rates.
Item-level forecasting
On the other hand, top-down forecasting takes a high-level approach, starting with overall market trends and then breaking down into individual units or departments. This method may be more efficient for larger organizations with multiple departments or product lines, as it provides a broad overview while still including input from various levels within the company. Bottom-Up Forecasting is a method used in financial and operational planning that involves individual department forecasts, which are then combined to create a company-wide forecast. It starts at a granular level, focusing on specific variables and details, and builds up to a full forecast. This approach often leads to more accurate forecasts as it takes into account the specific insights and expertise of different departments.
Scenario 1: Market Share Erosion
For instance, a driver-based model might link sales forecasts to marketing spend, allowing companies to see how different levels of investment impact revenue. Analyzing historical data is a fundamental aspect of bottom-up forecasting, providing a foundation upon which future projections are built. By examining past performance, businesses can identify patterns and trends that are likely to influence future outcomes. This retrospective analysis allows organizations to understand the factors that have historically driven success or failure, offering valuable insights for future planning. Imagine starting with the nuts and bolts of your business—unit sales, employee output, store activity—and piecing it all together to predict your future revenue. Unlike other methods that take a bird’s-eye view and work their way down, this approach starts at the ground level, building a forecast from the most detailed data points and scaling up.
Another example is SaaS business models, where subscription services are common. Here, companies will still consider sales channels but look at variables like what is a bottoms up forecast the number of active subscriptions, churn rate, and pipeline coverage to forecast revenue. Ultimately, the bottom-up forecasting formula is a way of calculating potential revenue for a specific period (i.e., a sales cycle, quarter, etc.).
Trends, competition and expectations for market share are some of the components used to set company and departmental goals. The top-down approach gives the planners the flexibility to fill into trends at a high level based on the marketplace information. The primary difference between top-down vs bottom-up forecasting is their starting point and approach. Top-down forecasting begins with market analysis and company objectives, then works downward to set targets.
What are the pros and cons of top-down forecasting?
But with a single, unified platform for support, forecasting can shift from a critical gap to a seamless, highly-valuable component of your business. Delivers real-time pipeline data and buyer engagement signals to bring science to the art of forecasting, enabling revenue leaders to go from guessing the future to changing it with recommended actions. Bottom-up forecasting serves a critical purpose in financial planning and business strategies as it emphasizes the importance of in-depth operational factors. The advantages of top-down forecasting include strategic alignment with business goals, efficiency in implementation, and valuable market context.
📆 Date: June 28-29, 2025🕛 Time: 8:30-11:30 AM EST📍 Venue: OnlineInstructor: Dheeraj Vaidya, CFA, FRM
- Best practice is to refresh sales forecasts weekly, with more comprehensive reviews conducted monthly and quarterly.
- Maintain complete independence between the two processes to ensure unbiased results.
- In many cases, organizations can benefit from combining the best of both worlds.
- Their attention to detail can be both their superpower and their kryptonite.
You must understand your organization’s current state, capabilities, and objectives. A startup entering a new market faces different forecasting challenges than an established enterprise with years of sales data. Top-down forecasting gives you a macro-level perspective, offering insights into the larger market context. Understanding the market position allows you to allocate resources effectively and identify where to focus your efforts.
Since this method is built on the input of various departments, it can be time-consuming and resource-intensive to collect and consolidate the data. Plus, without a unifying framework or guidance from the top, it’s easier for forecasts to stray from the company’s overarching goals. Once the overall projections are established, they’re divvied up among individual departments, teams, or product lines. These projections shape detailed sales budgets and production capacity plans.
As an added bonus, managers are more likely to adhere to the budget if they helped create it. With top-down forecasting, profits from various products and regions are averaged together rather than considered on an item-by-item basis. As a result, businesses may struggle when deciding how best to manufacture and distribute specific products.
Weekly updates should focus on pipeline changes and deal progression, while monthly reviews should reconcile top-down and bottom-up projections. Quarterly sessions should include more thorough analysis of forecast accuracy and methodology refinements. Modern forecasting platforms like Forecastio can automate these updates through real-time CRM integration, ensuring your forecasts always reflect the latest sales activity. Bottom-up forecasting starts at the ground level, with individual contributors and teams providing input on their specific areas of expertise.
The traditional approach to sales forecasting is filled with gaps, particularly for teams that use disparate systems and processes to manage the revenue cycle. Without a consolidated view of pipeline health and buyer insights, revenue leaders must guess their forecast, so they are perpetually at risk of surprise outcomes. Instead, they are forced to rely on the gut intuitions of their whole team to inform their forecasting models. The traditional approach to sales forecasting is filled with gaps, particularly for teams who use disparate systems and processes to manage the revenue cycle. They have dozens of dashboards, but they’re not sure they can trust the data. In contrast, top-down forecasting starts with broad assumptions and breaks them down into smaller components.